Traceability: what a Kenyan flower exporter can actually show you, and where each record comes from
"Fully traceable" is on every exporter's website and means nothing until you ask which record links which box to which field. For Kenyan cut flowers there are four kinds of record that do that work — the phytosanitary certificate's own fields, the production-site codes the rose requirement imposes, a certification scheme's traceability criteria, and the exporter's licence and pack-house registration — and they are held by different parties with different degrees of public verifiability. This page states each, with the instrument behind it, and names what is not verifiable from outside.
1. The certificate is the first traceability record — by design
ISPM 12 says the certificate's unique number "allows for trace-back of consignments"; the exporter's name and address identify the source "to facilitate its trace-back and audit"; the consignee's details exist so that the importing authority can "conduct trace-back of non-compliant imports"; and the place of origin is stated because it is where the commodity "may therefore have been infested." Trace-back is what the document is built for. It links a consignment to a country, an exporter and, where the destination requires it, a named place of production — and it is held by two governments, not by the seller. Every field, and what it must contain →
2. For roses into Europe, the trace goes to the production site
The false codling moth requirement for cut roses from the African continent asks the certificate to carry the codes of the place of production and of the production site, under the route the exporter has followed. For a buyer that is the deepest official trace available on any Kenyan flower: a KEPHIS-approved site, coded, on a government document, for every rose consignment into the European Union or Great Britain. It exists because a pest requires it, and it exists only for roses. The requirement, the four routes, and the codes →
3. Certification schemes: one step back, one step forward
GLOBALG.A.P.'s flowers-and-ornamentals standard requires a documented identification and traceability system that traces registered products back to the registered farm and forward to the immediate customer — one step forward and one step back — with harvest information linking a batch or lot to the production records. Where a grower also runs uncertified production, certified and uncertified products must be segregated and only the certified carry the GGN. MPS-GAP names traceability in its scope; the Kenya Flower Council's standard is benchmarked against GLOBALG.A.P.'s, but we have not read its traceability criteria and do not describe them. GLOBALG.A.P. for flowers → MPS → The Kenyan standard →
What a scheme's traceability proves. That the certified farm can produce, on audit, the record that links a lot to a field and a customer. It does not put that record in the buyer's hands; a buyer asks for it, and a certified farm can answer.
4. The exporter's standing credentials
The Agriculture and Food Authority licenses horticultural exporters and registers pack houses, annually, through its IMIS portal. The licence number, year and expiry, and the pack-house registration where the packer is the same company, are the records that establish who exported the box — and there is no public register on which a buyer can look them up. They are documents to request and read. How to verify a Kenyan supplier, step by step → The export sequence, with every charge listed →
What is not verifiable from outside — and what does not exist
- The exporter's licence and pack-house registration — no public register.
- Kenya Flower Council certification — the Council's register-of-producers page was empty when we read it, and its certification portal returned an access error to our request. We publish no count of certified producers and no way to check one.
- The Kenyan traceability system the Horticultural Crops Directorate describes — a secondary account; we have not read its public interface and do not describe how it works.
- KS 1758, the Kenyan horticulture code of practice — the Directorate's own link to it does not resolve. Why this site treats it as an open regulatory question →
- Stem-level traceability — Kenyan statistics are in tonnes and no public series counts stems by farm.
What to ask, and what a good answer looks like
- "Which production-site code will the certificate carry?" For roses into Europe there is one, and a supplier who knows the route knows it.
- "Show me the harvest record for one lot." A GLOBALG.A.P. or MPS-GAP holder has it; the audit requires it.
- "What is the licence number, year and expiry, and the pack-house registration?" Read the documents; they cannot be checked elsewhere.
- "What is the GGN, or the MPS letter and quarter?" Those two, unlike the rest, can be checked in a public register.
Ready to specify a requirement?
If you can state the product, stem length, head size, quantity, frequency and destination, we can give you a useful answer. If you cannot yet, say so on the form — every technical field has an “I don’t know yet, please advise” option.
Last verified 26 September 2026
Sources
-
IPPC — ISPM 12, Phytosanitary certificates (adopted 2022)
What we read
Section 5 - the unique identification number for trace-back; exporter's name and address for trace-back and audit; consignee details for trace-back of non-compliant imports; place of origin as where the commodity may have been infested.
-
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 — Annex VII, point 62 (false codling moth, cut flowers of Rosa)
What we read
The place-of-production and production-site codes required on the certificate under the systems-approach routes, as read for the false codling moth page.
-
GLOBALG.A.P. — Integrated Farm Assurance Smart, principles and criteria for flowers and ornamentals, v6.0 (September 2022)
What we read
FO 02.01.01 - documented identification and traceability system, one step forward and one step back, harvest information linking a batch or lot to production records; FO 02.02 - segregation and the GGN under parallel ownership.
-
MPS — MPS-GAP (service page, English)
What we read
Traceability named in the scope of MPS-GAP.
-
Agriculture and Food Authority — Horticultural Crops Directorate service hub and AFA IMIS portal
What we read
Licensing and pack-house registration through IMIS; no public register of licence holders located; the KS 1758 link on the Directorate's pages does not resolve.
-
Kenya Flower Council — Register of producers, and certification portal
What we read
The register page rendered only its title, with no entries, when read in a browser on 26 September 2026; the certification portal at portal.kenyaflowercouncil.org returned HTTP 403 to our request. No count of certified producers is published here as a result.